Diario

En esta sección cuento mis chorradas, lo que me pasa, lo que veo por ahí y cualquier ocurrencia que no encaja con los temas principales del blog. Todo sin buscar coherencia ni relación con el resto del contenido.




Nieva en Mordor.

Social influence is one of those concepts psychology has examined for decades because, frankly, we are far less independent than we like to think. Most of us walk around assuming our opinions emerge from some deep, untouched corner of our brilliant minds, when in reality we often glance at others before deciding what we believe. If there were an official certificate in “I swear I’m independent but absolutely am not,” most adults would already have it framed above their desk.
At its core, social influence refers to how our thoughts, attitudes and behaviours shift in the presence of others. This can be explicit, like a direct instruction, or subtle, like an unspoken expectation hovering in the air. Either way, it shapes how we act far more than we realise.
Conformity: the invisible pull of the group
Conformity is perhaps the most famous form of social influence. Solomon Asch’s classic studies showed that people often change their answers even when the correct one is glaringly obvious, simply because the group chooses something else. It’s that delightful moment when you think, “maybe I’ve been misjudging the length of lines my entire life.”
Sometimes we conform to avoid rejection, sometimes because we assume everyone else must know something we don’t. Of course, this becomes especially entertaining when the “everyone else” in question is a group you wouldn’t trust to plug in a toaster correctly.
The Asch paradigm is a famous social psychology experiment designed by Solomon Asch in the 1950s that demonstrated the overwhelming power of conformity. The test involved asking a group to compare the lengths of several lines; the trick was that all participants were actors instructed to give a blatantly wrong answer, except for the real subject, who was unaware of the setup. The results revealed that a sane person is capable of ignoring the evidence of their own eyes and lying just to avoid contradicting the majority, proving that the fear of standing out or the desire to fit in often weighs more heavily in our brains than objective truth itself.Obedience: when authority overrides personal values
Another powerful form of social influence is obedience. Stanley Milgram demonstrated that a symbol of authority a white lab coat, in his case can convince ordinary people to follow instructions that go against their moral code. Participants obeyed not because they were cruel, but because the situation blurred their sense of responsibility. It’s similar to nodding along to a dreadful idea in a meeting while thinking, “if this goes wrong, at least it wasn’t my plan.”
Obedience shows how dramatically our behaviour changes when a hierarchy is present. The stronger the authority, the easier it becomes to outsource responsibility.
The Milgram Experiment was a chilling psychological study conducted by Stanley Milgram at Yale University in the 1960s, designed to test the terrifying limits of obedience to authority. Participants were assigned the role of “teacher” and instructed by a stern experimenter in a lab coat to administer increasingly painful electric shocks to a “learner” (actually an actor faking the pain) every time they made a mistake.
Despite the learner’s desperate screams and eventual ominous silence, a shocking 65% of participants continued to deliver the maximum 450-volt shock simply because they were told that “the experiment requires that you continue.” It ultimately revealed that ordinary, decent people are disturbingly willing to inflict harm on others if an authority figure takes responsibility for the consequences.
Internal acceptance: when influence becomes conviction
Not all influence is about pressure. Sometimes we adopt ideas because, after some reflection, they genuinely resonate with us. This internal acceptance is the most stable form of influence; beliefs become part of our identity rather than something we perform for others. Education, cultural change and community-building rely heavily on this kind of transformation.
Internal acceptance also tends to appear gradually, which is why we rarely notice it happening. An idea starts as something we hear, then something we repeat, and eventually something we’re absolutely convinced we came up with ourselves. It’s the psychological equivalent of finding a song stuck in your head that you never chose to listen to in the first place. This slow, quiet shift is powerful because it doesn’t rely on pressure or authority; it works from the inside out. And once a belief settles into that inner space, good luck convincing anyone it didn’t originate from their own deep personal wisdom.
Context matters more than you think
These processes intensify under ambiguity, in large groups or when we strongly identify with the people around us. Uncertainty makes us look to others for cues; identity makes us want to align with them. Social media turbocharges this, offering a constant stream of approval, judgment and “trending” norms. It’s easy to feel independent while unknowingly synchronising our opinions with a crowd of strangers we’ll never meet.
At work, we follow unwritten norms without noticing. In public spaces, we adjust our behaviour to match the surrounding mood. Even in consumer choices, reviews, influencers and collective enthusiasm can push us toward decisions we would never have made on our own. If the internet had a motto, it would probably be: “You didn’t think this was your idea, did you?”
Be aware of social influence!
Recognising the power of social influence doesn’t mean rejecting it; it means becoming aware of it. Understanding these mechanisms helps us distinguish between choices we make intentionally and choices that simply follow the current. It also highlights an encouraging fact: positive behaviours spread too. Cooperation, mutual support and prosocial norms travel through groups as quickly as the less admirable impulses.
Studying social influence reveals something both uncomfortable and fascinating: we are profoundly social creatures even when we swear we’re not. We like to imagine ourselves fully rational and self-directed, but that illusion lasts only until someone says “let’s all go this way” and suddenly the whole group moves in unison. Independence evaporates faster than motivation on a Monday morning.
Ayer estuve encanado de la risa durante un cuarto de hora con esta mierda.


Hoy hace un año llegué, sin muletas, a una Valencia destrozada. Hablé con mi gente, todo el mundo bien, pero lo que vi fue un horror mucho peor de lo que me había imaginado.
La manifestación del sábado fue un grito de rabia contra Mazón. Hoy, un año después, todavía me estremezco cuando leo noticias y comentarios de la caverna diciendo que la culpa la tuvo Perro.
Mazón, púdrete en el infierno.


























Es lo mismo, pero no es igual.
Cuando el transporte público te deja en un túnel.


































